| TRAM
Flap Reconstruction |
|
A TRAM flap has traditionally
been one of the most commonly used types of breast reconstruction.
In recent years, however, the advent of perforator flaps (such
as the DIEP, SIEA, and SGAP flaps) has virtually eliminated
the use of TRAM flaps in my practice. Virtually all patients
who are candidates for a TRAM are also candidates for perforator
flaps. Most patients will choose the perforator flap reconstruction
over the TRAM when offered that option by their physician.
Unfortunately, there are not many surgeons trained in the
microsurgical skills necessary for perforator flap surgery
so the TRAM flap continues to be done commonly in other practices.
This page discusses TRAM flaps so that each patient can understand
all their options and hopefully clarify the differences between
TRAM flaps and perforator flaps. Perforator flaps are discussed
in more detail on the DIEP/SIEA/SGAP page.
A "flap" is typically a combination
of muscle, fat, and skin and can be taken from the patient's
abdomen, back, or other parts of the body. In the case of
a TRAM flap, the tissue is taken from the abdomen.
The type of TRAM flap (i.e. pedicle versus
free, etc) simply indicates the method by which the surgeon
moves the abdominal tissue up onto the chest site to create
the new breast. The decision as to which method to use is
made by the surgeon based upon the patient's anatomy and clinical
situation. A "free" TRAM is one which involves using
microsurgical techniques to move the tissue. Microsurgery
is one of Dr. Duffy's specialties.
The TRAM flap involves tissue being moved
from the abdomen and leaves the patient with a long scar across
the lower abdomen. The scar, and the tissue removed, is very
similar to that used during an abdominoplasty ("tummy
tuck") so patients typically have a much flatter abdominal
contour after surgery. |
| |
| What Are The
Advantages And Disadvantages Of Tram Flap Reconstruction? |
Advantages: |
- Since the reconstruction involves using the patient's
own tissues, the risks of implant reconstruction are avoided.
- It is typically easier to match the contralateral natural
breast with the patient's own (autologous) tissues when
compared with an implant reconstruction.
- When a TRAM flap is used patients essentially end up with
a "tummy tuck" at the same time as the breast
reconstruction.
- All of these advantages are also true of the perforator
flaps.
|
| Disadvantages: |
- TRAM flap reconstruction generally requires a longer and
more difficult surgery at the first stage when compared
with implants. This usually means a longer recuperation
for most patients.
- Many patients experience some abdominal muscle weakness
following a TRAM flap. This is because some of the abdominal
wall muscle is moved as part of the TRAM flap. This disadvantage
is reduced by the use of the DIEP/SIEA flaps instead of
the TRAM flap.
- There is the possibility of developing hernias at the
site where the flap is removed from, due to the incisions
made in the abdominal muscle wall. This disadvantage is
also reduced by the use of the DIEP/SIEA flaps instead of
the TRAM flap.
- Patients will have a scar across the lower abdomen where
the flap is taken from.
|